The tools keep changing
New features arrive every week. The team cannot tell which practices will last.
AI training
AI tools are already on the desktop. Most teams still lack a practical method. Lynray helps engineers use coding agents on real work. The team keeps technical judgement. Review standards stay clear.
Claude Code | Codex | OpenCode
Plan AI trainingThe adoption problem
Individual experiments do not create a reliable engineering practice for the organisation.
New features arrive every week. The team cannot tell which practices will last.
A few engineers get strong results. Others struggle to apply the same approach.
Generated code moves quickly. Review and verification do not always keep pace.
People use different prompts. They use different checks. Learning stays with each person.
A working method
The training stays practical. Each session connects directly to the way your team ships software.
The team works through real engineering tasks. The output can be used after the session.
The training fits your stack. It fits your codebase. It fits your review process.
The tools change. The training covers planning. It covers context. It also covers review. It covers verification.
Training path
Each stage creates an output that the team can keep using.
01
Choose one team. Choose a real workflow. Record the current delivery result.
Evidence: an agreed starting point
02
Engineers plan work with agents. They manage context. They review the result. They verify the change.
Evidence: completed exercises on relevant work
03
The team uses the method in normal delivery. Shared instructions make the workflow repeatable.
Evidence: a working team practice
04
Compare the result with the baseline. Keep the practices that improve useful delivery.
Evidence: a clear decision about the next step
Commercial result
Tool activity is not the result. Valuable software delivered safely is the result.
Measure the time from approved work to a safe release.
Measure how long completed work waits for a useful review.
Measure how often work returns because the result was incomplete.
Connect the improved workflow to software that reaches users.
Large organisations need common controls before agentic coding expands across repositories.
Current workshops
Each workshop is tailored to your team's needs and current delivery challenges. The session combines focused instruction with hands-on work. Your team leaves with methods and clear next steps it can use immediately.
One-day workshop for developers and architects
Claude Code | Codex | OpenCode
Learn how to use coding agents to deliver production-grade software. Agentic Engineering is a hands-on workshop focused on spec-driven development: you describe precisely what needs to be built and how, the agent implements it, and you retain full technical ownership of the codebase.
Developers and architects who want to use AI as a real coding partner without losing technical judgment.
For teams already using agents in production
Claude Code | Codex | OpenCode
A hands-on follow-up workshop for developers ready to take the next step in adopting agentic engineering across their organisation. We cover advanced context management, loop engineering, Ralph Loops, codebase structuring and multi-agent workflows.
Developers and architects with existing experience in agentic development, or who have completed the Agentic Engineering workshop.
Scaling success
A wider programme should follow evidence from normal delivery work.
Use a real codebase. Focus on one delivery problem.
Keep the useful instructions. Keep the review rules. Keep the measures.
Adapt the proven method to more repositories. Review the result after each rollout.
Describe the current delivery problem. Lynray will suggest a focused workshop or a wider enablement path.